AMU women students’ rock-solid protests kicks out provost who locked them up.
By Sharanya Dutta
Students at Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) today protested outside Bab-e-Syed, the historic gateway to AMU, demanding the resignation of the provost, Farukh Arjmand, after she locked students inside their hostel on 15th October. The VC, Zameeruddin Shah, addressed the students and they received written confirmation that the provost would resign. This comes after a flurry of recent reportage about the protests at AMU’s residence halls came to a climax yesterday, as students protested outside Indira Gandhi (IG) Hall (the residence for postgraduate and PhD students), and a recent article highlighted the suffocating rules imposed on women students at AMU’s Abdullah Hall, a residence for undergraduates. The protesting students had decided not to attend last night’s Sir Syed Day celebrations in honour of AMU’s founder.
On 15th October, the first day of the AMU Alumni Meet, a cultural programme was being held at Kennedy Hall, a few kilometres away from the campus. A list of the students who could attend the cultural programme was made so that permission could be got for them to stay outside past their curfew timings at 6.30 pm. Arjmand signed the list, and told the students to wait inside the hostel while she made arrangements for a bus big enough to take them all to the venue. When they went in, they were locked inside and forbidden from going out.
Students had been protesting since then, demanding Arjmand’s resignation. The Students’ Union and the Opposition were both supportive of the protests, which is very heartening and follows the ‘unprecedented’ appointment of three women to the Students’ Union this year.
The protests had first taken place outside IG Hall, and many women students had not left the campus. Even before she became provost, Arjmand (who is also a professor in the Chemistry Department) would serially indulge in character assassination, said Aisha, a first year Masters student of English Literature, who took part in the protests — “Even when the girls came in five minutes after curfew, she has said things about a sex racket.” When some students went to her to complain about the terrible quality of food, Arjmand allegedly said, “Theek hai. Zeher mila deti hoon sabke khaane mein” (Okay. Maybe I will poison everyone’s food).
Arjmand came to the protest and offered to resign, after she accepted the students’ charges. Her resignation letter was with the VC since 16th October — the VC hadn’t accepted her resignation on the grounds that this was humiliating to Arjmand (the VC himself is being probed for alleged financial and administrative misconduct). According to Aisha, the VC hadd said that it would be done, if at all, through “proper channels”.
On 17th October, the VC had come to the protest at 6.30 am, when very few girls were around, because many had gone for namaaz, and others had gone back to the hostel to sleep. According to Aisha, the VC said that if they wanted permission to stay out till 10 pm at night, they had to get written permission from their parents.
The girls had conceded that Arjmand be allowed to supervise the Founder’s Day dinner last night, on the condition that the VC give them written confirmation that she would resign today or tomorrow. This too, had been denied. More than 500 girls of IG Hall boycotted the Founder’s Day dinner, staying outside in the cold instead — one of the girls was also rushed to the health centre when she fell ill because of the cold.
It seems like in two years, none of these rules have changed. Sameya Parveen, who graduated from AMU in 2014, and has lived in both Abdullah and IG Hall, says that things like suffocating curfews and bad food existed then too. Parveen remembers asking an attendant at the dining hall whether they actually tasted the food they served. She was then called to the provost, who sent her parents a letter, calling her disobedient and saying she should be removed from the hostel. Parveen’s parents were supportive, and eventually the administration decided to deal with the matter internally.
“Abdullah Hall was like jail. We weren’t allowed out except Sundays. If we had to go somewhere, we would have to get a fax with our parents’ signatures, and then file an application, which would be scrutinised. Finally you could fill out the request in the slipbook [permission slips for day outs],” Parveen says. She remembers that as an undergraduate student, she once had to attend a function in Lucknow. Her local guardian had come to pick her up, but even though she completed the whole procedure, she hadn’t been allowed to go. In the IG Hall, which was marginally better, she wasn’t allowed to stay out a little late even though she was a member of the film and drama club, and the Cultural Education Centre had asked for permission.
As Aisha says, “There’s a lot of talk surrounding every protest, about defaming the University. I want to make it clear that no movement is about that. We love the University, we just shouldn’t love it so much that we are uncritical of its faults.”