• Home
  • News
  • Longform
  • Life
    • Jeans
    • Madam Zeenat’s Feminist Tarot
  • Health
  • Work
  • Culture
    • Books
    • Art
    • Music
    • Fashion
    • Cinema
    • TV
  • Sports
  • Kranti
  • Vaanthi
  • The FAK
  • About
    • Submissions
  • Home
  • News
  • Longform
  • Life
    • Jeans
    • Madam Zeenat’s Feminist Tarot
  • Health
  • Work
  • Culture
    • Books
    • Art
    • Music
    • Fashion
    • Cinema
    • TV
  • Sports
  • Kranti
  • Vaanthi
  • The FAK
  • About
    • Submissions
HomeHealthNo, C-sections Aren’t On the Rise Because Wo ...

No, C-sections Aren’t On the Rise Because Women are Lazy

January 28, 2016

By Deepika Sarma

toi-moi-les-autres-23-02-2011-2-g

Earlier this month, a colleague told me about overhearing a group of four young men chatting in a coffee shop. There were talking about women; more specifically, modern pregnant women. “Women these days” were slackers, they sniggered, choosing to deliver through Caesarean section instead of vaginally, in order to avoid having to go through labour pain.

It’s true that more Indian women are giving birth through C-section now than ever before: the latest National Family Health Survey tells us that private hospitals conduct over twice as many deliveries through Caesarean section than government hospitals. In private hospitals, 40.3 percent of births are done through C-section, while in public hospitals this figure is 16.9 percent. It’s a cause for worry, we’re told, for reasons ranging from greedy doctors and hospitals looking for financial gain on performing the costly procedure to spoiled modern women wanting to avoid long hours in labour and the pain of delivery, or wanting to time deliveries according to auspicious days (or worse, public holidays, keeping in mind the parents’ work schedules).

Here’s what we’re getting wrong. C-sections aren’t in opposition to ‘natural’, vaginal births. And they’re not an ‘easy’ option. “Getting a C-section might mean avoiding labour pain, but any surgery that requires anaesthesia comes with its own risks,” says Prof (Dr) Suneeta Mittal, a senior Delhi-based gynaecologist who headed Obstetrics and Gynecology at AIIMS, Delhi, and is now Director and Head of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Fortis Memorial Research Institute. After delivering through C-section, which requires sutures and stitches in the abdomen (and in many hospitals, is a costlier option), new mothers are advised to remain in the hospital and are fed intravenously for 24-48 hours, she says, unlike mothers who deliver vaginally, and who can be up and about soon after delivery.

Mittal, who has around four decades of experience in the field and has worked on public health policies, says that she has seen more women request C-sections in the last few years, looking for auspicious days and times to deliver or terrified by the prospect of a painful vaginal birth. But their number is very small, she cautions – “only about four or five percent of my patients.” Epidurals (pain-blocking regional anaesthesia) during vaginal birth provide an option for painless labour, she points out.

The biggest factor driving up the number of C-sections, she says, is that a large number of patients who can afford treatment in the private sector tend to be older, and their pregnancies tend to be more complicated, requiring C-sections. Indian women over 35 (who form the bulk of her patients now that she works in the private sector) are more likely to develop hypertension or gestational diabetes during pregnancy, and may require additional care, she says. “You have to take into the account the specific socio-demographic conditions of the women that you’re treating” when calculating recommended C-section rates for a population, says Mittal.

When speaking about the growing rate of C-sections, media reports often compare India’s C-section rates to those recommended by the World Health Organisation. Earlier, WHO recommended an optimal C-section rate of 10-15 percent across a population. For rates above 10 percent, it said, there was no evidence that mortality rates improve. But a current analysis of data from 194 WHO member states from 2005 to 2012 suggests that national caesarean delivery rates of approximately 19 per 100 live births are associated with lower maternal or neonatal mortality, and that previously recommended national targets may be too low. Mittal points to the WHO’s new “C-model”, a mathematical model to calculate the rate of C-sections based on population profile that allows for a customised reference rate for each population in specific contexts. She is co-author of a study on it and is currently conducting a joint study with obstetricians from Sita Ram Bhartiya Institute and Safdarjang Hospital along with Fortis Memorial Research Institute on the validation of the C-model to predict optimal C-section rates.

Many women who have given birth through C-section in India will tell you they had planned for vaginal deliveries all along and had nothing to do with the decision to undergo surgery.

“Only about 1 in 100 of my patients have ever requested a C-section,” says Dr Shaibya Saldanha, a gynaecologist and obstetrician who practices in private hospitals in Bangalore. “Even patients who are scared of the pain would rather bear it and have a vaginal delivery if it is the safest option for their child.” Any attempt to paint women as lazy for choosing a supposedly easier option, she says vehemently, is “disrespectful” to women.

The fact that doctors may be driving up the number of C-sections in the private sector looking to make money off performing surgeries or save time with a scheduled delivery rather than wait with their patients for hours during labour is a separate issue, and certainly needs addressing.

However, suggesting that the high number of C-sections is in part due to the fact that modern women are spoiled and want shortcuts to giving birth is plain wrong.

Underlying our misconceptions about C-sections is the deep-rooted belief that pain is something that women need to go through for a birth to be ‘natural’. And women’s pain is something we fail to take seriously. A 1990 study of postoperative patients in the US showed that men were treated for pain with pain medication significantly more frequently; women were significantly more frequently treated for pain with sedatives. The 2001 report ‘The Girl Who Cried Pain: A Bias in the Treatment of Pain’ by Diane E Hoffmann and Anita J Tarzian concluded that women experienced and reported “both more frequent and greater pain” than men, but were “more likely to be less well treated than men for their painful symptoms,” because of gender bias among healthcare providers.

But we aren’t indifferent to women’s pain – we want them to feel it. We sneer at women who opt for pain medication during delivery, for supposedly avoiding labour pain altogether through C-sections (if it is even a choice), for fearing pain at all. Because we believe pain is a natural biological burden that women have to bear, whether or not it involves motherhood. And the lack of agency that women face during childbirth, and the pain that is deemed acceptable for them to go through, is higher if women happen to be disadvantaged by class and caste; as media investigations in public hospital maternity wards – see this one in Kolkata and one in Faridabad district, Haryana, or this video series on rural pregnancies – from 2015 show, women in pain elicit reactions from doctors ranging from annoyance to downright violence.

Public health policy in India targets women for sterilisation programmes as a form of birth control, even if it means their death, instead of deploying the vastly less harmful methods it would require to encourage men to use contraception. Under the false promise of choice, (as this Ladies Finger investigation into injectable contraceptives being introducted in the public health system shows), women are pushed towards contraceptive options that may be inconvenient, painful and harmful.

And let’s not forget that endometriosis, the devastating disease linked to menstruation which affects an estimated 176 million women globally, receives little attention and remains under-treated.

Meanwhile, we continue to believe, as Dr Saldanha says sarcastically, “that women must be treated as pack horses. And if they don’t go through the requisite amount of pain, of course it must be because they’re lazy or somehow deficient.”

Because if you’re a woman, maybe a little pain – or even a lot of it – can’t hurt.

Tags: C-sections, childbirth, health, medicine, NFHS-16, pregnancy

Share!
Tweet

ladiesfinger

About the author

Related Posts

After Payal Tadvi’s Death Can We Allow Medical Education to Continue to Pretend to be Casteless?

Young Doctors in Maharashtra are Speaking Up About the Gross Sexism in Medicine

What They Don’t Tell You about Breastfeeding and Other Lessons from this Needless Mystery

Our Blind Spots on Rural Pregnancy in India Revealed, One Video at a Time

16 Responses to “No, C-sections Aren’t On the Rise Because Women are Lazy”

  1. Reply
    AnviSawant
    January 29, 2016 at 3:03 am

    I think the basic thing from which we could start is
    1.making it clear to the boys & men in our life that they have no rights to talk about issues in a judgemental manner
    which they are not personally facing.
    Everywhere we have these young educated boys deciding the length of our dress or how much we can express ourselves.
    You see them trolling on feminist pages demanding explanations for some click bait facts posted by them.
    As they hv got used to their opinions being heard & forced in everyone
    In our lives we hv to make it clear that no they cannot judge these issues or make fun of anyone.

  2. Reply
    rupandemehta
    January 29, 2016 at 8:10 am

    theladiesfinger Very interesting. I’ve heard so much about how women are scheduling their C section to not undergo pain & “plan it all out”

  3. Reply
    theladiesfinger
    January 29, 2016 at 8:14 am

    rupandemehta We did too. 🙂

  4. Reply
    inkroutes
    January 29, 2016 at 8:32 am

    theladiesfinger Lazy? Because why would a woman go for a simple epidural shot when she can have MAJOR, LIFE ALTERING SURGERY instead? #sigh

  5. Reply
    sandylogy
    January 29, 2016 at 9:17 am

    theladiesfinger from within my extended family: a mother who timed delivery for generic travel plans of in-laws (1)

  6. Reply
    sandylogy
    January 29, 2016 at 9:18 am

    theladiesfinger another who was asking in OT why they were anesthesing her when she had come for check up in 9th month (2)

  7. Reply
    sandylogy
    January 29, 2016 at 9:20 am

    theladiesfinger another who delivered normally before the doctor could reach the OT for ‘absolutely unavoidable’ C-sec (3)

  8. Reply
    sandylogy
    January 29, 2016 at 9:26 am

    theladiesfinger a maid’s daughter went unattended as the nurses felt she was unnecessarily making noise. The baby slid out, fell, died (4)

  9. Reply
    sandylogy
    January 29, 2016 at 9:29 am

    theladiesfinger for an expectant mother in India, C-sec is the price of attention from medical fraternity. (5)

  10. Reply
    aakhramka
    January 29, 2016 at 10:06 am

    theladiesfinger my first child was thru c-section and reasons being greedy doc.I use to feel that i missed out on an imp part of motherhood

  11. Reply
    aakhramka
    January 29, 2016 at 10:07 am

    theladiesfinger 2nd time when i Conceived on my first visit to doc i told her how keen i am for normal delivery if anything cold be done

  12. Reply
    aakhramka
    January 29, 2016 at 10:07 am

    theladiesfinger she assured me that she will take care of that and she did help me achieve my goal.

  13. Reply
    aakhramka
    January 29, 2016 at 10:08 am

    theladiesfinger My daughter was born past midnight, though being senior most doctor of one of the prestigious hospital of Mumbai ..

  14. Reply
    aakhramka
    January 29, 2016 at 10:08 am

    theladiesfinger she waited till that time so that i could
    deliver normally.

  15. Reply
    ilavenil
    February 18, 2016 at 12:04 am

    This article does not mention any scientific data at all, and merely mentions anecdotal evidence from two doctors – Mittal and Shaibya. In order to determine whether C-sections are opted for painless delivery or for preventing complications, a proper statistical analysis of pregnancy medical records across the country has to be carried out . How can data of just two institutes be used to arrive at an opinion? Ridiculous.

  16. Reply
    Rosesarered676
    March 19, 2016 at 9:29 am

    Can suggest a good senior Gynae, for high-risk pregnancy.
     Hope, it is of help:
    Dr. Prabha Singan. 

    Doctor operates at Manipal, Sagar hospital and if recalled correctly a consultant at Apollo clinic in Bangalore.

    The current contact details, was able to gather was:
    EPMC’s Women’s Clinic & Surgery#1280, 25th Main, 9th Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore 560 069. Karnataka, INDIA.
    +91-80-26646083/+91-80-65301686

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Trending

Sorry. No data so far.

Subscribe to our email newsletter!

You May Also Like

  • After Payal Tadvi’s Death Can We Allow Medical Education to Continue to Pretend to be Casteless? May 28, 2019
  • Jokha Alharthi’s Man Booker Win Reminds Us of Oman’s Recent Slave-owning Past May 24, 2019
  • In Avengers: Endgame, Black Widow is Sexy, Sterile and So Burnt By Marvel May 12, 2019
  • Let Us Admit the Sins of Atishi Marlena May 10, 2019
  • 20 Questions for SC Panel that Cleared the CJI of Sexual Harassment Charges May 9, 2019


Online Bachchi, Dil Ki Sachchi

Come on over for feminist journalism.

Politics. Pop Culture. Health. Sex. Law. Books. Work.

We write what we want to read.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy
  • About
  • Contact Us

Subscribe to our email newsletter!

Keep up with us!

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on YouTubeFollow Us on E-mail

Trending

Sorry. No data so far.

Copyright © 2018 The Ladies Finger
Subscribe to our RSS/Atom feed here