• Home
  • News
  • Longform
  • Life
    • Jeans
    • Madam Zeenat’s Feminist Tarot
  • Health
  • Work
  • Culture
    • Books
    • Art
    • Music
    • Fashion
    • Cinema
    • TV
  • Sports
  • Kranti
  • Vaanthi
  • The FAK
  • About
    • Submissions
  • Home
  • News
  • Longform
  • Life
    • Jeans
    • Madam Zeenat’s Feminist Tarot
  • Health
  • Work
  • Culture
    • Books
    • Art
    • Music
    • Fashion
    • Cinema
    • TV
  • Sports
  • Kranti
  • Vaanthi
  • The FAK
  • About
    • Submissions
HomeVaanthiThis Economics Textbook Implies that Domestic Work ...

This Economics Textbook Implies that Domestic Workers are Just Waiting Around to be Married by their Employers

May 12, 2017

By Maya Palit

Photo via Pexels.

You might be fed up of hearing the inane things that crop up in textbooks. Only last month, people stumbled across a section of a CBSE textbook that lectured readers about the ideal body shape for women. And another gem, which said being tall and having a ‘beautiful complexion’ is a pre-requisite if you’re even thinking about becoming an entrepreneur.

But if you were hoping that times had changed dramatically since a 2006 textbook compared a woman home-maker to a donkey, (because they both work all day and can apparently do without water and food for long periods of time) think again. Masters of Commerce students at the University of Mumbai have revealed that a Macroeconomics text-book couldn’t think of a better analogy for intangible income than to present a scenario where a man marries the woman who works for him.

According to reports, this is how the section goes:  “If a man employs a maid servant, the payment to her may be considered as a positive item of national income. If he marries her, she will continue to do the same work without payment, and therefore, may not be included in national income.” Of all the thousands of instances of unpaid labour, this one with its uneasy assumptions about the purpose women serve in the household and the world, clearly seemed like the easiest way to communicate a simple enough concept.

The Dean appeared to be annoyed when he was confronted, and said that if students wrote to the college, it could contact Manan Publications, the publisher, and have the paragraph removed. In the meantime if you want to look at a list of other pearls of wisdom about women in textbooks across the country, there’s enough of that to go around.

Tags: misogyny, textbook

Share!
Tweet

Maya Palit

About the author

Related Posts

‘Those Who Ought to be Scared, Are!’ Malayalam Star Parvathy on a Film Industry in Feminist Flux

A Celebration of What? The Virgin Tree and Other Misogynist Rituals

After Being Slut-Shamed and Abused Online, Actress Suchitra Krishnamoorthi Slaps Back With a Police Complaint

Bigg Boss Tamil is the Aiyyo Kadavule of Misogyny. What are We Doing Watching it?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Trending

Sorry. No data so far.

Subscribe to our email newsletter!

You May Also Like

  • After Payal Tadvi’s Death Can We Allow Medical Education to Continue to Pretend to be Casteless? May 28, 2019
  • Jokha Alharthi’s Man Booker Win Reminds Us of Oman’s Recent Slave-owning Past May 24, 2019
  • In Avengers: Endgame, Black Widow is Sexy, Sterile and So Burnt By Marvel May 12, 2019
  • Let Us Admit the Sins of Atishi Marlena May 10, 2019
  • 20 Questions for SC Panel that Cleared the CJI of Sexual Harassment Charges May 9, 2019


Online Bachchi, Dil Ki Sachchi

Come on over for feminist journalism.

Politics. Pop Culture. Health. Sex. Law. Books. Work.

We write what we want to read.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy
  • About
  • Contact Us

Subscribe to our email newsletter!

Keep up with us!

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on YouTubeFollow Us on E-mail

Trending

Sorry. No data so far.

Copyright © 2018 The Ladies Finger
Subscribe to our RSS/Atom feed here